Hattensty v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 1975
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 90 Okla. Crim. 410 - Bishop v. State · 85 Okla. Crim. 296 - Gentry v. State · Cardwell v. State · 4 Okla. Crim. 210 - Deeds v. State · 9 Okla. Crim. 342 - Greenwood v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It has been held that similar remarks may not constitute sufficient grounds for reversal where evidence of guilt is clear, but will be considered in connection with the contention that the punishment was excessive as tending to prejudice the defendant with the jury.””
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Cudjo v. State · Green v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.