Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 P.2d 979 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 1958
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 85 Okla. Crim. 322 - Ex Parte Lewis · 15 Okla. Crim. 437 - Cope v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is necessary for counsel for plaintiffs in error not only to assert error, but to support their contention by both argument and citation of authorities. Where this is not done, and it is apparent that the defendant has been deprived of no fundamental rights, this court will not search the books for authorities to support the mere assertion that the trial court has erred.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.