State v. Robertson’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bartkus v. People of State of Illinois · Heath v. Alabama · Jones v. Thomas · United States v. Aboumoussallem · United States v. Barrett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the dual sovereignty doctrine should not apply under the circumstances of this case and that his state court convictions are therefore barred under the double jeopardy clauses of both the United States and Utah constitutions, as well as by state double jeopardy statutes and principles of res judicata.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robertson“the State and the federal government are not considered to be in privity for purposes of res judicata.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robertson“any greater protection than the constitutional provisions we have addressed herein.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robertson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.