McAlpine v. Priddle’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers · Hurd v. Hodge · Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, District 17 · Dogherra v. Safeway Stores, Inc. · Lafarge Conseils et Etudes v. Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). We recognize that our decision in Marathon Oil addressed Alaska's Uniform Arbitration Act (UAA), and that Aimee and Donald's agreement is subject to Alaska's Revised Uniform Arbitration Act (RUAA). Ch. 170, §§ t-2, SLA 2004 (Alaska adopted the RUAA in 2004, and the RUAA governs arbitration agreements entered into on or after January 1, 2005.) AS 09.43.300-.595. Donald argues that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. Olson“an arbitrator exceeded the arbitrator's powers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. Olson“showing of sufficient cause for postponement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. Olson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.