State v. Peay’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2011
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on LaSalle Bank Lake View v. United States · State v. Schumpert · Hendrix v. Eastern Distribution, Inc. · State v. Raffaldt · State v. Lee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On appeal, Peay claims the judge should have required the state to present the full context of the videotape, including the audio portion, so that Peay could have meaningful cross-examination concerning the tape. To begin with, the judge’s ruling was made in limine, and was not final. Peay should have renewed his request when the tape was offered, as the judge may have changed his mind.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Burton“We realize the Supreme Court has held, even in the absence of a contemporaneous objection, a new trial should be granted in flagrant cases where a vicious, inflammatory argument results in clear prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.