Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 So. 2d 577 - Hassberger v. State

321 So. 2d 577 - Hassberger v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1977
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Alford v. United States · Smith v. Illinois · United States v. Varelli · United States v. Palermo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “CAN THE IDENTITY (ACTUAL NAME AND ADDRESS) OF A CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT BE KEPT SECRET WHEN THE TRIAL COURT FINDS (BY MEANS OF AN IN CAMERA PROCEEDING ON THE SUBJECT), THAT THE INFORMANT'S PERSONAL SAFETY IS AT STAKE — WHEN THAT INFORMANT APPEARS AS A WITNESS IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDING?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Grimes v. State · 350 So. 2d 1 - State v. Hassberger
  2. “(2) Informants. Disclosure of a confidential informant shall not be required unless the confidential informant is to be produced at a hearing or trial, or a failure to disclose his identity will infringe the constitutional rights of the accused.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Grimes v. State · 350 So. 2d 1 - State v. Hassberger

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.