Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 SW2D 188 - Wheeler v. Oxford

Wheeler v. Oxford’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2006

9 state decisions

60195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lee v. Galbreath · Barker v. Weingarten Riverside Co. · First Nat. Bank of Rule v. Chapman · Houston Fire & Casualty Ins. Co. v. Gerhardt · Watchtower Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A. writ of mandamus will not lie to control judicial or discretionary actions. First National Bank of Rule v. Chapman, Tex.Civ.App., 255 S.W. 807 ; Houston Fire & Casualty Ins. Co. v. Gerhardt, Tex.Civ.App., 281 S.W.2d 176 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The defendant has the burden of showing conclusively the existence of a situation that required rendition of such a judgment as a ministerial act. It is not conclusively established that such answers were intended by all the jurors as their verdict or as their unanimous and final answers to said controlling questions, nor that they tendered same as their verdict or that the court received it as such. The jurors said that they had not arrived at a verdict. The court took them at their word and discharged them because they could not reach a verdict. The court did not receive nor accept said answers as their verdict.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.