Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 S.W.2d 439 - State v. Vincent

State v. Vincent’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
states following
August 2004
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently August 2004 · most notably State v. Marti (1980), State v. Virdure (1963)

27 state decisions

130195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Shawley · State v. Lindner · State v. Whipkey · Cities Service Oil Co. v. Heffington · State v. Hogan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Homicide shall be deemed excusable when committed by accident or misfortune, in either of the following cases: (1) In lawfully correcting a child, apprentice or servant, or in doing any other lawful act by lawful means, with usual and ordinary caution, and without unlawful intent; or (2) In heat of passion, upon any sudden or sufficient provocation, or upon sudden combat, without any undue advantage being taken, and without any dangerous weapon being used, and not done in a cruel and unusual manner.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]f the evidence was sufficient to make a submissible case of manslaughter, the motion for judgment of acquittal was properly overruled, since the offense of manslaughter was included in the charge of murder in the second degree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.