Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 179th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Hooper v. State · Cain v. State · Clayton v. State · Watson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“her son from operating the vehicle. [2] ARTICLE 21.15 TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I disagree with the majority's decision because the evidence does not support a conviction for endangering a child under section 22.041(c) of the Texas Penal Code. Article 21.15 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides that whenever the accused is charged with acting recklessly or with criminal negligence in the commission of the offense, the charging instrument”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Mayberry v. State“must allege, with reasonable certainty, the act or acts relied upon to constitute recklessness or criminal negligence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Mayberry v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.