Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 321 SW3D 337 - Kuehne v. Hogan

Kuehne v. Hogan’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lynch v. Lynch · State Ex Rel. O'Blennis v. Adolf · In Re Estate of Laspy · Reynolds v. Diamond Foods & Poultry, Inc. · Rodgers v. Czamanske

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he fact of his guilt was previously determined when he was convicted of the criminal charges, and [the defendant] is therefore barred from asserting a collateral civil claim where actual innocence is an essential element.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hile Missouri cases rejecting malpractice claims against a criminal defendant's trial counsel have been decided, in part, based on the principles of collateral estoppel, those cases also emphasize public policy concerns associated with such claims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “found that where the plaintiff had been convicted of a crime and thereafter sued his trial counsel for malpractice, factual innocence of the criminal charge was an indispensable element of his cause of action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.