Geick v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 155th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Clewis v. State · Malik v. State · Curry v. State · Gollihar v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Alan Joel Geick on or about January 15, 2005 ... in Austin County, Texas, did then and there unlawfully appropriate, by acquiring or otherwise exercising control over property, to-wit: bulldozer, of the value of $20,000.00 or more but less than $100,000.00 from F. Phillips, the owner thereof, without the effective consent of the owner, namely, by deception, with intent to deprive the owner of the property....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Geick v. State““Effective consent,” includes consent by a person legally authorized to act for the owner. Consent is not effective if induced by deception or coercion or given by a person the actor knows is not legally authorized to act for the owner. 2”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Geick v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.