Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 A2D 592 - Smith v. United States

Smith v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1991
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 1991

4 state decisions

20197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 5010

Relies on Dorszynski v. United States · Small v. United States · Reed v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(d) If the court shall find that the youth offender will not derive benefit from treat ment under subsection (b) or (c), then the court may sentence the youth offender under any other applicable penalty provision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.