State v. Call’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 1990
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co. · Tremont v. United States · Ahtanum Irrigation District v. United States · United States v. Ronald Leaching, United States of America v. Jerome Tremont · State v. Pullen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““the appeal record, within its own confines, establishes beyond possibility of rational disagreement the existence of representational deficiencies by counsel which are plainly beyond rational explanation or justification . . . .” State v. LeBlanc, Me., 290 A.2d 193, 202 (1972)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Butts““to approach the evidence from a standpoint most favorable to the government, and to assume the truth of the evidence offered by the prosecution.” State v. Call, Me., 322 A.2d 64, 66, n. 1 (1974).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Matheson““the foundation for . . . appellate relief not having been laid at trial level, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict is not before us.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carver
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.