Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 ARK 272 - Billy/Dot, Inc. v. Fields

Billy/Dot, Inc. v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2015

14 state decisions

60199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Deitsch v. Tillery · Neal v. Wilson · Local Union No. 313, Hotel & Restaurant Employees v. Stathakis · State v. Torres · Esskay Art Galleries v. Gibbs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Billy/Dot admits that it operates a bingo establishment where money is at risk, but it is wrong in contending that Act 939 legalizes bingo. The Act specifically does not make bingo legal, as is evidenced by its Emergency Clause: “[T]hat this tax and the requirement for annual registration are not intended to address any question of legality or illegality of the conduct of playing bingo;” Act 939 only provides for taxation of bingo revenues. Because there is no lawful business operation at issue here, there is no valid property right to be protected in this matter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Here, there is no question but that playing bingo for money constitutes gambling which is a criminal offense under our statutes, and the chancery court so found. In doing so, the court correctly cited State v. Tones, 309 Ark. 422 , 831 S.W.2d 903 (1992), in its order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.