State v. Gould’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2021
2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Arizona v. Fulminante · Johnson v. United States · Irvin v. Dowd · Duncan v. State of Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Structural errors have not been recognized outside the realm of constitutional violations except in extraordinary circumstances. See, e.g., Nguyen v. United States , 539 U.S. 69 , 79-83, 123 S. Ct. 2130 , 156 L. Ed. 2d 64 (2003) (structural error when appeals panel was improperly constituted in violation of statutory requirement and thus did not have authority to decide appeal).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]t may well be, for certain ethnic groups and in some communities, that proficiency in a particular language, like skin color, should be treated as a surrogate for race under an equal protection analysis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.