Title v. Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
322 F.2d 21 · 1963
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably Sylvester TIPLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E. I. duPONT deNEMOURS AND CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellant (1971), RecoverEdge L.P. v. Pentecost (1995)
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Southern Pacific Railroad v. United States · Bridges v. Wixon · Galvan v. Press · Southern Pac Co v. United States · Phillips Chemical Co. v. Dumas Independent School District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he procedure so described shall be the sole and exclusive procedure for determining the deportability of an alien. *”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. MARTINEZ-LOPEZ · FEDORENKO“We recognize that the purpose of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel is to preclude the relitigation of issues previously determined between the same parties and that the application of the doctrines in many cases will have the practical effect of preventing the party against whom the issue was determined from again presenting evidence on that issue. We merely hold that Congress has evinced its intention that an alien have a right to present evidence at a hearing held for the purpose of determining his deportability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A final limitation on issue preclusion may be found in occasional statements that it 'should not be exercised in such a manner as to work an injustice.' Such general statements should be approached with great caution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.