East Bay Union of MacHinists Local 1304, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, and United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Intervenor. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, East Bay Union of MacHinists Local 1304, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, and United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenors’s Empirical Analysis
322 F.2d 411 · 1963
Citation profile
33 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1986 · most notably Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board (1964), Ford Motor Company v. National Labor Relations Board (1979)
33 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Phelps Dodge Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Katz · National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc. · Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““During the period when the Union was seeking to negotiate a new contract, the Company was considering contracting out its maintenance work to an independent contractor. By July 27, four days before the end of the contract term and approximately two months after the Union’s notice, the Company had decided to contract out all its maintenance work then being performed by 73 men.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The use of this language was a reflection of the congressional awareness that the act covered a wide variety of industrial and commercial activity and a recognition that collective bargaining must be kept flexible without precise delineation of what subjects were covered so that the Act could be administered to meet changing conditions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.