Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 F.2d 426 - Freeman v. United States

Freeman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

322 F.2d 426 · 1963

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
February 1980
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently February 1980 · most notably Robinson v. United States (1972), United States v. Bell (1974)

28 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions

220196319701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Draper v. United States · Skibs v. Otis McAlLister & Co. · Brownell v. Stjepan Bozo Carija · Ellison v. United States · Bell v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(b) For the purpose of this section— “(1) the term ‘vagrant’ shall mean any person who is a narcotic drug user or who has been convicted of a narcotic offense in the District of Columbia or elsewhere and who— * * * * * “(B) is found in any place, abode, house, shed, dwelling, building, structure, vehicle, conveyance, or boat, in which any illicit narcotic drugs are kept, found, used, or dispensed; $ H* $ ^ ^ “(i) In all prosecutions under the provisions of this section, the burden of proof shall be upon the defendant to show that he has lawful employment or has lawful means of support realized from a lawful occupation or source.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.