Frison v. United States

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 1, 1963.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1963-10-01

2 counsel of record

Relies on Prince v. United States · Pearson v. United States · Lingo v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1963-10-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1993

7 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1G.E. Oppenneer, Denver, Colo. (Grant, Shafroth, Toll & McHenrie, Denver, Colo., were with him on the brief), for appellant.

¶2Donald P. MacDonald, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Lawrence M. Henry, U. S. Atty., was-with him on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before LEWIS, HILL and SETH, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellant, having been convicted of an offense against the United States from which judgment no appeal was taken, seeks to have produced at government expense the transcript of the trial proceedings and other documents because he “is going to make a collateral attack upon his conviction pursuant to the provisions of Section 2255, Title 28 U.S.C.A. … ” The trial court denied the application.

¶6The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in Prince v. United States, 10 Cir., 312 F.2d 252; Pearson v. United States, 10 Cir., 313 F.2d 868; Lingo v. United States, 10 Cir., 320 F.2d 260.