Badger v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
322 F.2d 902 · 1963
Citation profile
29 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently August 1999 · most notably Parrott v. United States (1966), Lockhart v. United States (1969)
29 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Estep v. United States · Dickinson v. United States · Pennsylvania v. Budd Co. · Yaich v. United States · Donato v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Furthermore, on January 8, 1962, the local board was under no duty to reopen and consider anew the classification of appellant since appellant made no written request for a reopening, and since reopening does not follow automatically from such a request when made. 32 C.F.R. § 1625.2 ; Shaw v. United States, 264 F.2d 118 (9th Cir. 1959).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.