Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 F.3d 1178 - In Re Thomas James Dyer

In Re Thomas James Dyer’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

116
cited by 116 later decisions
January 2023
most recently cited

5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 116 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably In Re Dennis Leroy Saxman (2003), Zilog Inc v. III

5 district ·

640200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · State v. Simpson · McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co. · Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co. · U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court may issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this title. No provision of this title providing for the raising of an issue by a party in interest shall be construed to preclude the court from, sua sponte, taking any action or making any determination necessary or appropriate to enforce or implement court orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of process.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “...an individual injured by any willful violation of a stay provided by this section shall recover actual damages, including costs and attorney's fees, and, in appropriate circumstances, may recover punitive damages.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “we hesitate[d] to extend that principle to the contempt context. Generally, a party cannot be held in contempt for violating an injunction absent knowledge of that injunction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.