Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 F.3d 438 - In Re M Dianne Smothers

In Re M Dianne Smothers’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2020

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

40200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper · In re Oliver · Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Federal courts have inherent powers necessary for them to function as an institution.” In re Smothers, 322 F.3d 438, 442 (6th Cir.2003) (citing, inter alia, Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 43 , 111 S.Ct. 2123 , 115 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991) (explaining that the courts’ inherent powers are animated”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “when confronted with actions that may not fall within the court's contempt power, this inherent power to maintain respect and decorum grants courts the flexibility to equitably tailor punishments that appropriately fit the conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A]bsence alone cannot be contempt.... The court must learn why the attorney was late in order to determine whether the attorney had criminal intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.