Longenette v. Krusing’s Empirical Analysis
322 F.3d 758 · 2003
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 47 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably Price v. Philpot (2005), Fernandez v. Artuz (2005)
5 federal appellate · 47 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 983 · 19 U.S.C. § 1607 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1608 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1609 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1613 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1615 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1621 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Houston v. Lack · Holmberg v. Armbrecht · Bowen v. City of New York · Dusenbery v. United States · United States v. Beggerly
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.