Days v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
322 F.3d 863 · 2003
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Johnson v. Johnson (2004), Dillon v. Rogers (2010)
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on V. C O Churner · Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc. · Underwood v. Wilson · Mark Eric Wright v. Gayle Hollingsworth Etc et al. · Wendell v. Asher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under section 1983 of this title, or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We, of course, do not hold that an untimely grievance in and of itself would render the system unavailable, thus excusing the exhaustion requirement. Such a holding would allow inmates to file suit in federal court despite intentionally evading the PLRA's exhaustion requirement by failing to comply with the prison grievance system.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Giano v. Goord“not jurisdictional and may be subject to certain defenses such as waiver, estoppel, or equitable tolling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Almond v. Tarver
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.