Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 FSUPP 238 - Gregory v. Gaffney

Gregory v. Gaffney’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
March 1974
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roth v. United States · National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. · Stanley v. Georgia · United States v. Petrillo · Book Named 'John Cleland's Memoirs of Woman of Pleasure' v. Attorney General of Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ (a) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to intentionally disseminate obscenity in any public place. A person, firm or corporation disseminates obscenity within the meaning of this Article if he or it: * * * “ (3) Publishes, exhibits or otherwise makes available anything obscene; or “(4) Exhibits, broadcasts, televises, presents, rents, sells, delivers, or provides; or offers or agrees to exhibit, broadcast, televise, present, rent or to provide; any obscene still or motion picture, film, filmstrip, or projection slide, or sound recording, sound tape, or sound track, or any matter or material of whatever form which is a representation, embodiment, performance, or publication of the obscene. “(b) For purposes of this Article any material is obscene if: “ (1) The dominant theme of the material taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interest in sex; and, “ (2) The material is patently offensive because it affronts contemporary national community standards relating to the description or representation of sexual matters; and, “(3) The material is utterly without redeeming social value; and, “(4) The material as used is not protected or privileged under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of North Carolina.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.