Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 Ill. App. 3d 1029 - People v. Fields

322 Ill. App. 3d 1029 - People v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024

13 state decisions

60200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holbrook v. Flynn · 66 Ill. 2d 261 - People v. Boose · 109 Ill. 2d 369 - People v. Friesland · United States v. Benson · United States v. Cyprian

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As it relates to the issue of vindictive prosecution, this Court has reviewed the information also on this request. This Court has reviewed time lines, has reviewed the information that’s been provided by the parties. Again, this Court is not making a ruling that they can use [it] as a defense, this Court is not making any ruling as of today that the State is pursuing this prosecution in retaliation for the exercise of a protected right, or that there is any animus by the Prosecutors or by agencies of the prosecution that— that has been established. But given what I know at this point, I am going to allow discovery on that particular issue.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Since Fields’ motion failed to set forth a colorable basis for concluding that his prosecution was selective or vindictive, we conclude that no further discovery is required, and we affirm the decision of the trial court.” Fields, 322 Ill. App. 3d at 1033 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]t is `a common courtroom practice' to have uniformed guards present”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.