322 Ill. App. 3d 792 - Coleman v. Abella’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 183 Ill. 2d 366 - People v. Coleman · 181 Ill. 2d 112 - Shimanovsky v. General Motors Corp. · 311 Ill. App. 3d 7 - Seef v. Ingalls Memorial Hospital · 155 Ill. 2d 305 - Boatmen's National Bank v. Martin · 317 Ill. App. 3d 817 - SUSNIS EX REL. SUSNIS v. Radfar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(f) Identity and Testimony of Witnesses. Upon written interrogatory, a party must furnish the identity and location of witnesses who will testify at trial, together with the subject of their testimony. (g) Opinion Witness. An opinion witness is a person who will offer any opinion testimony. Upon written interrogatory, the party must state: (i) the subject matter on which the opinion witness is expected to testify; (ii) the conclusions and opinions of the opinion witness and the bases therefor; and (iii) the qualifications of the opinion witness; and provide all reports of the opinion witness. *** (i) Duty to Supplement. A party has a duty to seasonably supplement or amend any prior answer or response whenever new or additional information subsequently becomes known to that party. If a deposition of an opinion witness is taken, the witness’ testimony at trial will be limited to the opinion expressed therein, in addition to those opinions identified in answers to Rule 213(g) interrogatories. The opinions expressed in a deposition need not be later specifically identified in Rule 213(g) answers but, upon objection at trial, the burden is on the proponent of the witness to prove the opinions were provided in deposition or Rule 213(g) interrogatory.” 177 Ill. 2d Rs. 213(f), (g), (i).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““(1) surprise to the adverse party; (2) the prejudicial effect of the witness’ testimony; (3) the nature of the witness’s testimony; (4) the diligence of the adverse party; (5) whether the objection to the testimony was timely; and (6) the good faith of the party calling the witness.” Coleman, 322 Ill. App. 3d at 799 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.