Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 MASS 335 - Buyarsky

Buyarsky’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
7
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably Mark v. Kahn (1956), Petition of Hauptly (1973)

27 state decisions

11019481950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burlen v. Shannon · Foye v. Patch · Birnbaum v. Pamoukis · Gordon v. O'Brien · Cochrane v. Cochrane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A man, if acting honestly, may assume any name he desires and by which he wishes to be known in the community in which he lives or in the trade circles in which he does his business. The law does not require a man to retain or to perpetuate the surname of his ancestors. The common law recognizes his freedom of choice to assume a name which he deems more appropriate and advantageous to him than his family name in his present circumstances, if the change is not motivated by fraudulent intent. The statute . . . does not restrict his choice but aids him to secure an official record which definitely and specifically establishes his change of name. We think that it is not only consistent with but also desirable in the public interests that the fact that one has commonly used a name for a number of years should be fixed and established by a public record showing that the name adopted has become his legal name. Any confusion that might have attended the use of a name honestly ■ assumed by one is dispelled by a record showing that that name is his legal name.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.