Michael E. Marr, P.C. v. Langhoff’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 2011
2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Adler v. American Standard Corp. · Williams v. State · C. D. W. v. State · Maryland Metals, Inc. v. Metzner · Meehan v. SHAUGHNESSY COHEN
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is unnecessary in this case to decide whether a partnership or corporate model applies”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Work in progress at the time of dissolution is an asset of the dissolved firm and the partners of the dissolved firm have an obligation to complete the work in progress. The compensation of the partners for completing work in progress during the winding up of the dissolved partnership is determined, absent special agreement, by the partners’ interest in the profits of the dissolved partnership.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Dissolution” means the change in the relation of the partners caused by any partner ceasing to be associated in the carrying on of as distinguished from the winding up of the business.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Berk v. Sherman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.