Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

322 Md. 718

Ennis v. Crenca

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 9, 1991

Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 1991-05-09

Relies on Attorney Grievance Commission v. Alperstein · Sawyer v. Humphries · Ennis v. Crenca

Decided 1991-05-09

¶1ORDER

¶2The Court having considered the motion for reconsideration filed in the above entitled case, it is this 9th day of May, 1991

¶3ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the motion be, and it is hereby, denied. As made clear in the opinion in this case [322 Md. 285, 587 A.2d 485 (1991) ],

“[t]he case is before us on appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County dismissing the plaintiffs complaint. Therefore, for purposes of this appeal, the allegations of the complaint must be accepted as true.”

¶4Like other cases involving appellate reversal of dismissals based on the allegations of the complaint and the inferences therefrom viewed most favorably for the plaintiff (e.g., Sawyer v. Humphries, 322 Md. 247, 587 A.2d 467 (1991)), the evidence at trial may be different from the allegations of the complaint and may lead to different results.

/322/md/718 · .json · Public domain