Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 N.J. Super. 535 - State v. Walker

322 N.J. Super. 535 - State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 2016

17 state decisions

140199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bibby v. United States · Kelly v. Robinson · Hervey v. Shalala · State v. Yarbough · State v. Reyes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order .to meet its burden with respect to the identification of the individual who committed the offenses the State has presented the testimony of several witnesses. You’ll recall they included Miss Santana, Mr. Power and Miss Acosta. And you will recall that those three individuals testified in this courtroom and identified the defendant in this court as the person who committed the offense or offenses. According to the witnesses, them identification of the defendant in court is based upon the observations and perceptions which they made of the defendant on the scene at the time the offense or offenses were being committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an explanation of the elements of the offenses with which the defendant is charged, any applicable defenses and the State's burden of proving the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “difference between a court `explaining the law in the context of the facts of the case,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.