Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 N.W.2d 71 - State v. Alexander

State v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2018

7 state decisions

301982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hampton v. Commonwealth · State v. Baych · Mularkey v. State · State v. Williams · Dillon v. City of Tulsa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “724.4. A person who goes armed with a dangerous weapon concealed on or about his or her person, or who, within the limits of any city, goes armed with a pistol or revolver, or any loaded firearm of any kind, whether concealed or not, or who knowingly carries or transports in a vehicle a pistol or revolver, commits an aggravated misdemeanor, provided that this section shall not apply to any of the following: 1. [Weapon in own dwelling, etc.] 2. [Peace officer.] 3. [Armed forces.] 4. [Correctional officers.] 5. [Weapons in certain containers.] 6. [Weapons in vehicles under certain conditions.] 7. [Target practice.] 8. Any person who has in his or her possession and who displays to any peace officer on demand a valid permit to carry weapons which has been issued to the person, and whose conduct is within the limits of that permit. No person shall be convicted of a violation of this section if the person produces at his or her trial a permit to carry weapons which was valid at the time of the alleged offense and which would have brought the person’s conduct within this exception if the permit had been produced at the time of the alleged offense. 724.5. It shall be the duty of any person armed with a revolver, pistol, or pocket billy concealed upon his or her person to have in his or her immediate possession the permit provided for in section 724.4, subsection 8 and to produce same for inspection at the request of any peace officer. Failure to so produce such permit shall constitu”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.