Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 N.W.2d 84 - Struebin v. State

Struebin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
8
states following
October 2000
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 2000

4 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

100198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nevada v. Hall · Pennsylvania v. New Jersey · Ehrlich-Bober & Co. v. University of Houston · Carlson Corp. v. University of Vermont · 490 F. Supp. 307 - Daughtry v. Arlington County, Va.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “California’s exercise of jurisdiction in this case poses no substantial threat to our constitutional system of cooperative federalism. Suits involving traffic accidents occurring outside of Nevada could hardly interfere with Nevada’s capacity to fulfill its own sovereign responsibilities. We have no occasion, in this case, to consider whether different state policies, either of California or of Nevada, might require a different analysis or a different result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “found nothing in the understanding of the framers, the structure of the Constitution, article III, the eleventh amendment, or the full faith and credit clause that required California to accord Nevada immunity from suit in California or to apply the Nevada CT Page 7935 statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Iowa’s interest in full compensation outweighs Illinois’ interest in extending its statutory limitation on recovery to its Iowa torts. Iowa’s policy is a legitimate attribute of its own sovereignty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.