State v. Guzek’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably State v. Muhammad (1996), Mayfield v. Woodford (2001)
2 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because it does not present an issue subject to proof in the traditional sense, rather[,] it frames a discretionary determination for the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Moore“impartial jury clause * * * does not govern what type of evidence that an impartial jury, once empaneled, may hear or consider”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.