Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 P2D 204 - In Re Ware

In Re Ware’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 1967
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on City of Kingfisher v. Jenkins · Corzine v. Traders Compress · Hollis v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. · Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Clow · McCarthy v. Forbes Painting & Decorating Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In Skaggs v. M. & W. Mining Co., 195 Okl. 423 , 158 P.2d 722, 723 , it is stated: `* * * Petitioner relies upon the rule that where there is sufficient evidence to support an award it will be sustained. As stated in Kemp v. Comar Oil Co., 185 Okl. 527 , 94 P.2d 882 , obviously such a rule has no application to situations where the fact has been resolved against the claimant as in the case at bar. * * *'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The claimant furnished medical evidence to the effect that the death resulted from an accidental injury arising out •of and in the course of the employment. Respondent furnished medical expert testimony to the contrary. In such •case we have several times held that it is neither the province nor the duty of. this Court to disturb the finding based thereon.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.