Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 P2D 431 - Fields v. State

Fields v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 1977
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Rizor · 88 Okla. Crim. 107 - Argo v. State · 95 Okla. Crim. 342 - Henderson v. State · 82 Okla. Crim. 199 - Bowman v. State · Cox v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The function of the Criminal Court of Appeals is limited to ascertaining whether there is a basis in the evidence, on which the jury can reasonably conclude that accused is guilty as charged.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[Wjhere there is competent evidence in the record from which the jury could reasonably conclude the defendant was guilty as charged, this court will not interfere with the verdict, even though there is a sharp conflict in the evidence, and different inferences may be drawn therefrom, since it is the exclusive province of the jury to weigh the evidence and determine the facts.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.