Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 P3D 84 - Dault v. Shaw

Dault v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

1 district · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on New York Indians v. United States · Weaver v. United States · Mills v. Denver Tramway Corp. · McGill v. Wahl · Tenala, Ltd. v. Fowler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hether an appellate court will for the first time take judicial notice of a judicially notable fact rests largely in its own discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.