322 Pa. Super. 6 - Commonwealth v. Frank’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 236 Pa. Super. 488 - Commonwealth v. Conti · 298 Pa. Super. 294 - Commonwealth v. Volk · 265 Pa. Super. 494 - Commonwealth v. Anderson · 255 Pa. Super. 25 - Commonwealth v. Eddington · Commonwealth v. Mutnik
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The test to be applied by our Court in appraising the sufficiency of the evidence is a two step inquiry. First, we must regard all the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, accepting as true all evidence upon which the fact finder could have based the verdict and then we must ask whether that evidence, along with all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, was sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.