Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 So. 2d 211 - State v. Brown

322 So. 2d 211 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably 389 So. 2d 1263 - State v. Douglas (1980), State v. Wilkerson (1981)

26 state decisions

12019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Leland v. Oregon · State v. Howard · State v. Crook · State v. Richmond · State v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A motion for a continuance based upon the absence of a witness must state: (1) Facts to which the absent witness is expected to testify, showing the materiality of the testimony and the necessity for the presence of the witness at the trial; (2) Facts and circumstances showing a probability that the witness will be available at the time to which the trial is deferred; and (3) Facts showing due diligence used in an effort to procure attendance of the witness."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 340 So. 2d 563 - State v. Jones · 341 So. 2d 847 - State v. Bennett
  2. “The failure of the sheriff to comply with the requirements herein shall have no effect whatsoever upon the validity of the proceedings thereafter against the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 362 So. 2d 744 - State v. Guzman
  3. “defendant's seizure did not cause such prejudice as would warrant the declaration of a mistrial”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 411 N.J. Super. 392 - State v. Kueny

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.