¶1For the reasons assigned in the opinion rendered this same date in Sims v. Tolar et al., La.App., 322 So.2d 318, the judgment of the district court rejecting plaintiff’s demands is affirmed at plaintiff-appellapt’s costs.
¶2Affirmed.
322 So. 2d 320
Decided November 6, 1975
Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1975-11-06
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1976
1 state decisions
Relies on Sims v. Tolar
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1975-11-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1For the reasons assigned in the opinion rendered this same date in Sims v. Tolar et al., La.App., 322 So.2d 318, the judgment of the district court rejecting plaintiff’s demands is affirmed at plaintiff-appellapt’s costs.
¶2Affirmed.