Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 322 SO2D 468 - Rich v. State

Rich v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
January 1999
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 1999

12 state decisions

60197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ross v. State · Redwine v. State · Ladnier v. State · 257 So. 2d 505 - Roberson v. State · Hankins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In passing upon a motion for directed verdict or peremptory instruction in a criminal case, courts must assume that all evidence for the state is true and that all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from the evidence are true, and, if from all the testimony there is enough in the record to support a verdict, motion should be overruled.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.