Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 323 Ark. 116 - Mitchell v. State

Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2022 · most notably Cooper v. Oklahoma (1996), MacKintrush v. State (1998)

48 state decisions

3201996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Walker v. State · Ward v. State · Biggers v. State · Rockett v. State · Middleton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the defendant must make a prima facie case that racial discrimination is the basis of a juror challenge. In the event the defendant makes a prima facie case, the State has the burden of showing that the challenge was not based upon race. Only if the defendant makes a prima facie case and the State fails to give a racially neutral reason for the challenge is the court required to conduct a sensitive inquiry.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) showing that the totality of the relevant facts gives rise to an inference of discriminatory purpose, (2) demonstrating total or seriously disproportionate exclusion of [the group in question] from the jury, or (3) showing a pattern of strikes, questions or statements by [the proponent of the strike] during voir dire.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.