Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 323 Ark. 583 - Nance v. State

Nance v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
2
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably Smith v. State (2003), Yancey v. State (2001)

4 federal appellate · 56 state decisions

2301996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gerstein v. Pugh · Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission · Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Mills v. State · Willett v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[W]here but one offense is charged but the several modes provided by the statute by which it may be committed are charged in the disjunctive, the indictment is good. The reason is that the charge is based upon one offense, and the different modes of committing it provided in the statute are based upon the same transaction.' " Nance v. State , 323 Ark. 583 , 918 S.W.2d 114 , 123 (1996), quoting Kirkpatrick v. State , 177 Ark. 1124 , 9 S.W.2d 574 , 575 (1928). This statement does not change the conclusion here. First, the court was discussing the capital murder, not terroristic threatening, statute. Second, this is not a case where "several modes provided in the statute ... are charged in the disjunctive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.