In re Daniel N.’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Kelly v. United States · State v. Ubaldi · State v. Reid
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, cases in which we have invoked our supervisory authority for rule making have fallen into two categories .... In the first category are cases wherein we have utilized our supervisory power to articulate a procedural rule as a matter of policy, either as [a] holding or dictum, but without reversing [the underlying judgment] or portions thereof .... In the second category are cases wherein we have utilized our supervisory * powers to articulate a rule or otherwise take measures necessary to remedy a perceived injustice with respect to a preserved or unpreserved claim on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In almost all cases, [c]onstitutional, statutory and procedural limitations are generally adequate to protect the rights of the [appellant] and the integrity of the judicial system.... [O]nly in the rare circumstance [in which] these traditional protections are inadequate to ensure the fair and just administration of the courts will we exercise our supervisory authority ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Ostrowski v. Avery , 243 Conn. 355 , 378 n.18, 703 A.2d 117 (1997) ; see also Campos v. Coleman , supra, 319 Conn. at 61-64 , 123 A.3d 854 ; Neyland v. Board of Education , 195 Conn. 174 , 179-83, 487 A.2d 181 (1985) ; cf. In re Daniel N. , 323 Conn. 640 , 653, 150 A.3d 657 (2016) (describing three part test as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.