Meerdink v. Ott

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Sept. 26, 1963.

Decided Oct. 18, 1963.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1963-10-18

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1963

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Meerdink v. Ott

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1963-10-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1See also 3 Cir., 307 F.2d 721.

¶2John A. Spaeder, Erie, Pa. (Marsh, Spaeder, Baur, Spaeder & Schaaf, Erie, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

¶3John M. Feeney, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Thomas L. Cooper, McArdle, Harrington & McLaughlin, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

¶4Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6We have examined the record and have weighed the arguments of counsel for the respective parties. We can perceive no error in the proceedings in the court below and we find the appeal lacking in merit. The judgment will be affirmed.