Hayes v. Buda’s Empirical Analysis
323 F.2d 748 · 1963
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2010
7 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sibley v. Nason · 19 Wis. 2d 390 - D'ANGELO v. Cornell Paperboard Products Co. · Ruebush v. Funk · Lehmann v. Farwell · Gibson v. Gibson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is our opinion that if the Wisconsin legislature intended that “property” subject to “sequestration” should include a right of action for injuries to one’s person it would not obscure that intention by the general language of paragraph (l)(b) of § 128.19 but would have placed the words “his person or” following the word “to” in paragraph (l)(c). We conclude on this point that because the right of action was transferable by assignment it was not ipso facto property which vested under § 128.-19.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) Property transferred by him in fraud of his creditors. (b) Property which prior to the filing of the petition or assignment he could by any means have transferred or which might have been levied upon and sold under judicial process against him. (c)Rights of action arising upon contracts or from the unlawful taking or detention of or injury to his property. (2) The receiver or assignee may avoid any transfer by the debtor of his property which any creditor might have avoided and may recover the property so transferred or its value from the person to whom it was transferred unless he was a bona fide holder for value prior to the filing of the petition or assignment hereunder.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“unless by the law of the State such rights are subject to attachment, execution, garnishment, sequestration or other judicial process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.