Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 323 F.2d 823 - Thomas Tabor and Agnes F. Tabor v. Teresa C. Ulloa

Thomas Tabor and Agnes F. Tabor v. Teresa C. Ulloa’s Empirical Analysis

323 F.2d 823 · 1963

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
January 2014
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably Max Clausen, Dba Clausen Oysters Lilli Clausen, Dba Clausen Oysters v. M/v New Carissa, Its Engines, Apparel, Electronics, Tackle, Furniture, Boats, Appurtenances, Etc of Panamania Flag in Rem Taiheiyo Kaiun Co. Ltd., a Japanese Corporation in Personam Green Atlas Shipping Sa, a Panamanian Corporation in Personam Tmm Co. Ltd., a Japanese Corporation in Personam, Max Clausen, Dba Clausen Oysters Lilli Clausen, Dba Clausen Oysters v. M/v New Carissa, Its Engines, Apparel, Electronics, Tackle, Furniture, Boats, Appurtenances, Etc of Panamania Flag in Rem Taiheiyo Kaiun Co. Ltd., a Japanese Corporation in Personam Green Atlas Shipping Sa, a Panamanian Corporation in Personam Tmm Co. Ltd., a Japanese Corporation in Personam (2003), Aparacor, Inc. v. United States (1978)

20 federal appellate · 3 district ·

110196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Platt v. Union Pacific Railroad · 135 Cal. App. 2d 352 - St. James Church of Christ Holiness v. Superior Court · United States v. Johnson · Emeric v. Alvarado

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Decisions of the California court subsequent to the adoption of the Code by Guam are not binding, but are persuasive of the construction to be given provisions in the Code of Guam borrowed from the California Code.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a legislature is presumed to have used no superfluous words”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.