Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 323 F.2d 894 - Entin v. Stevens

Entin v. Stevens’s Empirical Analysis

323 F.2d 894 · 1963

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
September 1994
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 1994

10 federal appellate ·

901963197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc. · Ten-Six Olive, Inc. v. Curby · Universal Atlas Cement Co. v. Commissioner · 11 F. Supp. 288 - In Re Chase Commissary Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The facts, as set out above, show us that the lessor was aware of the status of the debtor at all times and was informed of intended plans as they developed. To these plans the lessor apparently consented until the telegram of December 13, 1962, the day before the referee’s hearing on the proposed sale, in which the lessor gave notice of his intention to cancel the lease. Prior to this the lessor had accepted each month’s rental payments without reservation. It further appears that the action of [the lessor] at this time is to gain a superior bargaining position with respect to the lease in question. The Court finds that under all the circumstances the lessor had waived the right he may have had to cancel the lease. 323 F.2d at 897 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.