Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 323 F.3d 178 - Toussie v. Powell

Toussie v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis

323 F.3d 178 · 2003

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
September 2021
most recently cited

16 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Iqbal v. Hasty (2007), Clubside, Inc. v. Valentin (2006)

16 federal appellate ·

190200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mitchell v. Forsyth · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit · Johnson v. Jones · Swint v. Chambers County Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “substantial factual overlap bearing on the issues raised.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “rejected judicially established pleading requirements on the principle that where the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not specify heightened pleading requirements, Rule 8(a)(2)’s liberal system of ‘notice pleading’ governs.” See id. (internal citation omitted); see also Jessamy v. City of New Rochelle, 292 F.Supp.2d 498 , 513 n. 18 (S.D.N.Y.2003) (declining to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Because [the defendant] has, under our prior cases, a colorable claim to qualified immunity, we have jurisdiction to consider his claim, since otherwise that claim would be effectively lost”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.