Xoom Incorporated’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2024 · most notably Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick (2010), R.F.M.A.S., Inc. v. Mimi So (2009)
1 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Data General Corporation v. Grumman Systems Support Corporation · Waldman Publishing Corp. v. Landoll, Inc. · Trandes Corporation v. Guy F. Atkinson Company, and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority · Otis Clapp & Son, Inc. v. Filmore Vitamin Co. · Nelson-Salabes Incorporated v. Morningside Development Llc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Copyright registration is a jurisdictional prerequisite to bringing an action for infringement under the Copyright Act.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“All the parts of a compilation or derivative work constitute one work.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“because Imageline owned copyright [in the compilations] and in the underlying works of each, its registration of [the compilations] was sufficient to permit an infringement action on the underlying parts, whether they be new or preexisting. ... If Xoom improperly used any copyrightable image contained in the [registered compilations], new or preexisting, that usage would give rise to potential statutory damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.